Survey Software, Web Survey, Online Surveys, and Enterprise Feedback Management solutions from Vovici

Voice of Vovici Blog
Survey Research & Enterprise Feedback Management

   Contact Us       Customer Login       Support    Blog  
 

Experience Vovici :: request a callExperience Vovici :: request a callExperience Vovici :: request a demo

Subscribe to our Blog


Your email address

VISION 2010 :: Vovici User Conference :: Save the Date :: May 10-12, 2010

Download your free copy our eBook: Survey Software Success

Free EBook!

We've compiled much of the blog into a free, 73-page ebook, Survey Software Success. The book outlines seven best practices for conducting online surveys.

> Download your free copy

Solutions For:

Online Survey Solutions Voice of the Customer SolutionsMarket Research Solutions Customer Support Solutions Voice of the Employee Solutions Government Solutions

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Focus Groups vs. Online Communities

 | Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Facebook Facebook | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

In a similar way that web surveys have replaced telephone surveys in many applications, feedback-oriented online communities will replace focus groups in many instances.

                                               

1990s 2000s
Quantitative Telephone survey Web survey
Qualitative Focus group Feedback community

Focus groups are better than online communities in one key dimension:  they take place in the real world, where you can show people real products and have them interact with them, where you can look participants in the eye and get a sense of their emotions as they tell you something.  But that benefit is not enough.

Focus groups draw from fewer participants than online communities. They are bounded by geographic restrictions that can make it hard to recruit from niche markets.  They draw from small groups of participants and therefore have much higher costs per participant than online communities.  An opinionated participant can distort discussion in a room in a way that doesn't happen in an online forum.

But the biggest advantage of online communities is that they become an asset.  Where focus groups are variable costs, online communities are fixed costs.  Where focus groups must be organized to address the issue at hand, not providing results for weeks or months, online communities are like standing focus groups that can provide answers in hours or days.  Where focus groups can only provide qualitative research, well-designed marketing-research online communities can provide qualitative and quantitative research.

                                                                                                                                                               

Focus Group Online Community
Medium In person Online
Participant Size 8-12 100s-1000s
Respondent Bias Medium Low
Time Frame 2 hours Years
Turnaround Time Weeks-Months Hours-Days
Geography Major Metropolitan Area Worldwide
Cost Variable Fixed
Cost per Response High Low
Methodology Qualitative Qualitative & Quantitative

I always enjoyed focus-group research.  I enjoyed writing the discussion guides, moderating the events or sitting behind the glass watching the moderator, transcribing the results afterwards and preparing a report and presentation.  Heck, I even enjoyed the travel.  But I was young, and didn't realize that every city in America looked the same from a focus-group facility. 

Geez, I remember reading about a half dozen books on focus groups.  I even wrote software (Perseus FocusReports) to use to transcribe and analyze focus groups.  I partnered with a great focus-group facility.  I thought I'd always do focus groups.  But I was young.

Comments

Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.