Survey Software, Web Survey, Online Surveys, and Enterprise Feedback Management solutions from Vovici

Your email:
   

Welcome to the Listening Post!

Your single source for everything Voice of the Customer (VoC) and Customer Experience (CxP). And, don’t forget you can follow us on twitter @vovici, or come check us out on Facebook and join the Vovici Network on LinkedIn.

 

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

The True Cost of Low Employee Loyalty

 

Employees who feel trapped or are at a high risk for leaving won't just hurt your organization in the future, when they quit your company.  They are hurting your organization now.

According to a 2007 study from Vovici partner Walker Information, disloyal employees are less likely to recommend your organization as a good place to work than loyal employees are: just 39% of such employees are very likely or extremely likely to recommend your company, compared to 92% of loyal employees (a 53-point difference).  But not only are disloyal employees not promoting your company to those outside the organization, they aren't doing any favors for those inside the organization either. Disloyal employees are 29 points less likely to help coworkers with heavy workloads, and 38 points less likely to take on tasks that are "above and beyond the call of duty".

Employee_loyalty_behavior
These trapped and high risk employees are 43 points less likely to do what it takes to make your company successful or to do their part to execute your company's strategy.  

Too often, I have heard company executives express concern about employee loyalty only because of the direct costs incurred when employees leave and must be replaced.  While the costs of advertising open positions or contracting with recruiters can add up, and the investment required to train a new employee until they are productive can be significant, the true cost of employee disloyalty is paid today, in how such employees behave before they leave, and in how much less you get from such employees as compared to your loyal staff.  

This makes it more important than ever for you to conduct an employee loyalty satisfaction study and get everyone in your organization working together to ensure your success.

Comments

Employee loyalty: more than enough anger to go around. Business and the public sector are into a phase of creative disassembly where reinvention and adjustments are constant. Hundreds of thousands of jobs are being shed by United Technologies, GE, Chevron, Sam’s Club, Wells Fargo Bank, HP, Starbucks etc. and the state, counties and cities. Even solid world class institutions like the University of California Berkeley under the leadership of Chancellor Birgeneau & Provost Breslauer are firing staff, faculty and part-time lecturers. Yet many employees, professionals and faculty cling to old assumptions about one of the most critical relationship of all: the implied, unwritten contract between employer and employee. 
 
Until recently, loyalty was the cornerstone of that relationship. Employers promised job security and a steady progress up the hierarchy in return for employees fitting in, performing in prescribed ways and sticking around. Longevity was a sign of employeer-employee relations; turnover was a sign of dysfunction. None of these assumptions apply today. Organizations can no longer guarantee employment and lifetime careers, even if they want to. 
 
Organizations that paralyzed themselves with an attachment to “success brings success’ rather than “success brings failure’ are now forced to break the implied contract with employees – a contract nurtured by management that the future can be controlled. 
 
Jettisoned employees are finding that the hard won knowledge, skills and capabilities earned while being loyal are no longer valuable in the employment market place. 
 
What kind of a contract can employers and employees make with each other? The central idea is both simple and powerful: the job or position is a shared situation. Employers and employees face market and financial conditions together, and the longevity of the partnership depends on how well the for-profit or not-for-profit continues to meet the needs of customers and constituencies. Neither employer nor employee has a future obligation to the other. Organizations train people. Employees develop the kind of security they really need – skills, knowledge and capabilities that enhance future employability. 
 
The partnership can be dissolved without either party considering the other a traitor..  
 
Posted @ Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:22 AM by Milan Moravec
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Latest Posts

Loading
What's New
Don't Be in the 4%
VoC on Twitter
Verint Blog
Verint Blog: Read the Latest from the Verint Systems Blog