Free EBook!
We've compiled much of the blog into a free, 73-page ebook, Survey Software Success. The book outlines seven best practices for conducting online surveys. Download your free copy here.
|
Survey Research & Enterprise Feedback Management
|
RSS Feed
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Thu, Jun 25, 2009
 I hate that every gas station near me has disabled the ability for me to set the fuel dispenser to fill the tank and then walk away, safe in the knowledge the automatic cut-off will kick in. Now I have to stand at the pump manually holding the switch on the fuel dispenser until the tank is full. No doubt this is a safety innovation in case the auto cut-off failed. In a similar way, many users of our survey software dislike the fact that the first time they publish a new survey, it goes into test mode. This is a not-so-subtle reminder that they should double-check the survey before inviting participants to respond. Did I say double-check? How about triple-check and quadruple-check? For very important surveys, you should: - Self-Test – Run through the survey, answering it yourself, multiple times.
- Pre-Test – Invite coworkers or friendly outsiders to take the survey.
- Pilot Test – Invite 10% of the targeted list to take the survey.
- Publish – Invite the world to take the survey.
Self TestHere are some of the things that I self-test or review before publishing a survey: - Question flow: Do questions proceed in a logical manner from topic to topic?
- Question wording: Is each question worded clearly and unambiguously and is it free of typos and grammatical errors? The preceding question itself would make a horrible survey question: whenever one question asks for an answer on multiple, different topics, it should be split into multiple questions.
- Question types: Do the question types match the wording? Can respondents answer both "yes" and "no", or do the choices not correspond to the question? This frequently happens when a series of questions has the same choices or scale, where one or more questions is force-fitted into a method that doesn’t work.
- Scale consistency: Are related questions using the same scale? I just edited a questionnaire this week that had two different satisfaction scales, because one was written off the top of the survey author’s head and the other was copied from the question library. Do different scales arrange items consistently from best to worst or worst to best? I once had to ignore a question in analysis because it used a 1-5 rating scale with 1=best, 5=worst, in reverse of all earlier questions; the open-ended responses made it clear that some customers used the scale as written, and others used the scale as expected based on the earlier scales. (Yet another reason to avoid numbers in favor of labels in rating questions.)
- Answer validation: Is the survey configured to enforce the validation described in each question? For instance, making sure an email address is in the format jane@example.com, that that a fill-in-the-blank question is limited to numbers or that a choose-many question has a limit to the number of choices that can be selected
- Required answers: Are required answers used sparingly but appropriately, especially for critical questions and for questions that drive skip patterns? For closed-ended questions that are required, is there an appropriate choice in each case, such as “Don’t know”, “Can’t remember” or “Not applicable”?
- Skip patterns: Do the skips and conditional branches take respondents where we intended? Editing a question can sometimes delete or invalidate skip logic.
- Errors of omission: What questions did you leave out that you should have included?
Pre-TestThat last question is particularly hard to answer in a self-test. When I am feeling very unsure of a study, or the results are strategic rather than tactical, I will pre-test it on coworkers or, even better, on a small sample of the target audience (no more than 50). I will end the survey with some questions about the survey itself, to identify areas or survey structures that were confusing or ambiguous. Pilot TestSometimes after a pre-test, I will pilot-test the survey to 10% of the participant list, in a “shakedown cruise” of what one favorite client describes as the “final draft but not the final final draft” of the questionnaire. This gives even more opportunities to catch errors before the survey goes live to the full list. PublishOk, now you can publish the survey and invite one billion people to complete it. You still missed something—trust me. Most likely something related to one of your last-minute changes. But you’ve dramatically lowered your odds of missing something major. Take it from hard-won experience: If your CEO or the CEO of your client cares about this survey, you definitely want to make sure you self-test, pre-test and pilot-test before you publish. And that’s why Vovici surveys go into test mode first. Now fill up the tank and go on a test drive before that road trip.
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Tue, May 26, 2009
One of the most frequent mistakes I see when reviewing questionnaires are poorly written scales. Novice survey authors often create their own scale rather than using the appropriate common scale. It's hard to write a good scale; instead you are better off rewording your question slightly so that you can use one of the following. | Acceptability | Totally unacceptable, Unacceptable, Slightly unacceptable, Neutral, Slightly acceptable, Acceptable, Perfectly acceptable | | Agreement | Strongly disagree, Disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither agree or disagree, Somewhat agree, Agree, Strongly agree | | Amount of Use | Never use, Almost never, Occasionally/Sometimes, Almost every time, Frequently use | | Appropriateness | Absolutely inappropriate, Inappropriate, Slightly inappropriate, Neutral, Slightly appropriate, Appropriate, Absolutely appropriate | | Awareness | Not at all aware, Slightly aware, Somewhat aware, Moderately aware, Extremely aware | | Beliefs | Very untrue of what I believe, Untrue of what I believe, Somewhat untrue of what I believe, Neutral, Somewhat true of what I believe, True of what I believe, Very true of what I believe | | Concern | Not at all concerned, Slightly concerned, Somewhat concerned, Moderately concerned, Extremely concerned | | Familiarity | Not at all familiar, Slightly familiar, Somewhat familiar, Moderately familiar, Extremely familiar | | Frequency | Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always | | Importance | Not at all importance, Slightly important, Somewhat important, Very important, Extremely important | | Influence | Not at all influential, Slightly influential, Somewhat influential, Very influential, Extremely influential | | Likelihood | Not at all likely, Slightly likely, Somewhat likely, Moderately likely, Very likely | | Priority | Not a priority, Low priority, Medium priority, High priority, Essential | | Probability | Not probable, Somewhat improbable, Neutral, Somewhat probable, Very probable | | Quality | Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent | | Reflect Me | Very untrue of me, Untrue of me, Somewhat untrue of me, Neutral, Somewhat true of me, True of me, Very true of me | | Satisfaction (bipolar) | Completely dissatisfied, Mostly dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Mostly satisfied, Completely satisfied | | Satisfaction (unipolar) | Not at all satisfied, Slightly satisfied, Moderately satisfied, Very satisfied, Extremely satisfied |
This list follows Krosnick's advice to use 5-point unipolar scales and 7-point bipolar scales.
Let me know any of your favorite scales that I omitted.
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Thu, May 21, 2009
You've chosen the list of people you want to invite to your survey. You still have a lot of hurdles to jump to get each recipient to actually take your survey:
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Wed, May 13, 2009
Some organizations, such as ecommerce sites like Amazon and EBay, are fortunate in that they have the email addresses of every single one of their customers. When they invite a random selection of customers to participate in a web survey, they can be assured that the results are truly representative of their customer base.
Most organizations are not so fortunate. A traditional B2B vendor might have the email addresses for perhaps half of its customers. A consumer brand might have email addresses for fewer than 10% of its customers. For these organizations, web surveys with random samples are only representative of the customers for whom they have email addresses. Such organizations must be very careful when presenting their results to not generalize them to all customers. Significant differences probably exist between the group of customers for which they have email addresses and the group for which they don't, especially since email addresses are typically collected as part of "loyalty" (frequent-buyer) programs. As a result, surveys of such email lists will overstate satisfaction, repurchase likelihood and willingness to recommend.
Organizations with unrepresentative email lists need to take the following steps for web-survey success:
- Describe the survey not as representative of all customers but of the target population for which the organization has email addresses.
- Work with the marketing department to increase the percent of customers and prospects who have provided email addresses.
- Conduct a telephone study or paper survey of customers for which your organization doesn't have email addresses to determine their demographics, firmographics and attitudes. This can be used to contrast this group with the group accessible by email.
- Conduct more-frequent surveys of members of the customer loyalty program. Such programs typically use email for most communication.
- Don't put faith in polls placed on your corporate web site; such polls are unrepresentative.
What steps have you taken to make sure that your web surveys are representative of your customer base?
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Wed, Apr 29, 2009
Your survey invitation gets past the spam filters and shows up in someone's email inbox. Now the recipient will have two or three items at hand to decide whether to click Delete or to open your message:
- From field - The From field consists of the sending email address and the alias for that address. Nothing will get your email deleted faster than having an impersonal email address without an alias, such as - a particular favorite! - noreply@example.com. Always include the alias. What type of alias works best varies by organization; examples to experiment with for your invitations include:
- The name of an individual - The name of an employee managing the survey or commissioning the survey can be very effective.
- The name of the brand or company - While this can be impersonal, it may outperform the names of individuals for B2B vendors.
- Brand name + "Surveys" - For some organizations a From field such as "Acme Surveys" works best.
- Hybrid - Some panel companies test combinations such as "Acme Surveys & Jane Doe".
- Subject line - The text of the subject line will have the biggest impact: "Your Feedback Needed", "Some Quick Questions for You", "Help Us Serve You Better", "Learn What Your Peers Think About -----" are all subject lines that have been successful for survey invitations. Your organization will need to experiment to determine what works best for your audience.
- First line of the invitation - Some email programs display the first line of the invitation in grayed-out text immediately after a bold subject line. All the more reason to pay special attention to the copy you use in the body of your invitation.
What tactics have improved your organization's open rate on surveys?
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Tue, Apr 21, 2009
Sift out the finer distinctions and most questionnaires are constructed from four basic building blocks. These four, fundamental question types are:
| Open-ended questions | Essay Questions | Long text responses |
|---|
| Fill-in-the-Blank Questions | Short text responses | | Closed-ended questions | Choose-One Questions | Single choice selected |
|---|
| Choose-Many Questions | Multiple choices selected |
Essay QuestionThe essay question, in a web survey, is displayed as a multi-line TEXTAREA: 
Respondents can enter a few words, a few paragraphs, and even a few pages. Typically essay questions store 32,000 to 64,000 characters of text. We've had respondents copy and paste dozens of pages of text into essay questions.
This question type is best used for understanding in detail what a respondent believes in their own words. Fill-in-the-Blank QuestionA fill-in-the-blank question is displayed as one or more text boxes with short labels, and is designed for gathering short responses:

It can also be used for contact information or address information: 
Responses to text boxes are often validated to follow a common pattern. Common validations include:
- Email address
- Whole number within a range
- Real number within a range
- Date
- Telephone number - U.S./Canadian format or international format
- Zip codes and postal codes
Choose-One QuestionThe most common question type is that of the single-select multiple-choice question, where a respondent chooses one and only one of the available options. Choose-one questions are typically shown with radio buttons or dropdown boxes. While choose-one questions constrain the choices of the respondent, they are much quicker to answer and much easier to analyze. Choose-Many QuestionsThe multiple-select multiple-choice question allows the respondent to check all the choices that are applicable to the question. Most survey software uses the standard checkboxes of HTML forms to show these questions: These four questions can then be combined together in matrix questions. For best practices for each type of question, see these posts:
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Fri, Apr 17, 2009
You've gotten the recipient to jump all the hurdles to get to the survey except for the last one - reading the invitation and clicking on the survey link.
You now have the challenge of writing a short but motivating invitation that will prompt your recipient to become a respondent.
As with any attempt at marketing, you have less than eight seconds to make a first impression. A clever use of images can help catch people's attention. You need to tell recipients what you want them to do as soon as possible in the invitation. Know your audience and write the invitation with this knowledge in mind. Keep the invitation short-but cover the key points.
Patrick Glaser's "A Playbook for Creating Survey Introductions for Online Panels" provides a useful outline for a survey invitation, along with example phrases.
I wish I could give you some proven catchphrases for subject lines that work with every survey, but what worked once--"Help us improve our products" or "Share your opinion"--might not work on the next round of survey invitations to the same audience. Experimentation and inventiveness are essential.
Do not make privacy claims that you may not keep. This tends to happen by mistake rather than from any intention to mislead recipients. Often you are surveying your customer base and will want to set up survey alerts and email triggers so that you can respond directly to dissatisfied customers to address their problems; don't then tell them in the invitation that their survey responses will only be used when aggregated with other responses.
Similarly, do not offer incentives that you can't deliver. Again, this tends to happen by mistake, when an organization promises every respondent a reward, then has far more awards than imagined. See last week's post for strategies for survey incentives.
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Mon, Apr 13, 2009
The hypertext nature of this blog is great for when you want to dive in on one topic and follow links to related posts. However, it's not well suited to those times when you want to read past posts in detail.
To address this, I've compiled much of the blog into a free, 73-page ebook, Survey Software Success. The structure of the book was inspired by a presentation we did and outlines seven best practices for survey success:
- Focus on a Goal
- Survey the Right Number of People
- Plan Your Mail Campaign with Care
- Craft Your Questions Well
- Order Questions Logically
- Get the Survey Length Right
- Close the Feedback Loop
Each of the above is its own chapter, and the book is about 73 pages long. You can use this form to get your free copy.
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Tue, Apr 07, 2009
With the rise of Bayesian filters, most email users are seeing fewer spam messages in their Inboxes. You want to make sure that your survey invitation and reminder emails aren't flagged as spam, which would artificially lower your response rate.
Because spam filtering programs are constantly changing, it is best to send your draft email invitation to the personal email addresses of friends and coworkers simply to make sure all receive it. Be careful when discussing survey incentives in the email, as words and phrases such as "free" and "act now" are more likely to get your invitation classified as spam. Hectic punctuation - ALL CAPS, lots of exclamations!!!, dollar $ign$, L33t sp34k - are also more likely to get your message flagged.
Another important aspect of spam for U.S. organizations is the CAN-SPAM Act, which requires three types of compliance for organizations sending commercial email messages to organizations with which they have no relationship. (In other words, messages sent to customers do not fall under the jurisdiction of this act.) The three types:
- Unsubscribe compliance - Each email contains an obvious and working method for the recipient to unsubscribe. All opt-out requests are processed within 10 days. The suppression lists of opt-outs are not mailed to.
- Content compliance - The email From field is accurate, the subject field relates to the body of the email message and is not misleading, and the body contains a valid physical mailing address for the organization sending the message. (Surveys on sexual topics must be labeled in the subject header as containing sexually-explicit content.)
- Sending-behavior compliance - Your email messages cannot be sent through an open relay and cannot contain a false header. Almost all hosted survey software applications comply with this. Additionally, your message cannot be sent to an email address that was harvested (downloaded and parsed) from web pages.
The penalty for failure to comply with these items ranges from a misdemeanor charge to an aggravated offense, depending on the size and scope of the offense. Where appropriate, you should consult a lawyer or review the CAN-SPAM Act in more detail to guarantee your email is in compliance.
What tools have you found helpful for writing email messages that will get past spam filters?
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Mon, Mar 16, 2009
We often argue for the need to respect your potential respondent's time and interrupt them as little as possible. Yet our survey software includes the ability to schedule the survey invitation and as many follow-up email reminders as you would like:

Reminders can be an annoying nuisance to recipients and should be avoided unless really necessary to your survey. Here are when they are necessary:
- You are surveying a small population (e.g., employees, major accounts) and have not yet reached your recommended sample size for 95% confidence.
- You are attempting a census instead of a survey.
- You suspect that initial responders may vary in key ways from later responders. For some studies, when we run the numbers we find no measurable difference between early and late respondents; for others, we find important differences in satisfaction and loyalty.
- You are using email triggers to alert you to dissatisfied respondents and want to make sure that you have the opportunity to address their issues.
Following up survey invitations with reminders is the most dramatic way to improve your response rate. For one recent study, a series of three reminders doubled the response rate:

Many of our users do not send out reminders because they are concerned about harassing potential respondents. However, since over 80% of responses to a closed-participation survey come within 24 hours of sending out an email invitation or reminder, think of that first reminder as doing the recipient a favor: often they meant to respond, but went on to other things, and the invitation got pushed down further in their in-box. Your reminder brings it back to the top of their mind - and their in-box.
One way to minimize the pain of reminders is to make sure that each recipient is given a unique hyperlink to the survey (this may be inappropriate in certain surveys where anonymity is vital). That way, reminders will only be sent to those recipients who have not yet completed the survey.
The only thing more annoying than receiving an email reminder about a survey you haven't taken is to receive a reminder to one that you have taken!
All Posts
Error sending email
Email sent successfully
|