Free EBook!
We've compiled much of the blog into a free, 73-page ebook, Survey Software Success. The book outlines seven best practices for conducting online surveys.
> Download your free copy
|  |
|
RSS Feed
Posted by Justin Corrado on Thu, Nov 19, 2009
We often have prospects looking to migrate to a survey software application from a home-grown system. Recently, we've been seeing more organizations looking to move from Microsoft SharePoint, an enterprise content management platform.
What clients liked about SharePoint when it comes to building online surveys:
- The WYSIWYG form editor makes it easy to build basic surveys.
- It offers complete flexibility for programmers to use HTML, JavaScript, AJAX techniques, Flash and other standard web development approaches.
- It stores data directly in the repository that the administrator selects (e.g., SQL Server or Oracle).
- Survey results are readily exported as CSV (Comma-Separated Value) or XLS files.
Here are the features that caused SharePoint users to move to a dedicated feedback platform:
- It is difficult for business users to create surveys of moderate or significant complexity with SharePoint.
- The lack of integrated email support meant that invitations, reminders and thank-you emails had to be created outside the system.
- The lack of panel management meant administrators couldn't target respondents and track past survey activity.
- It is difficult to personalize surveys based on known data.
- SharePoint lacks survey-specific web services, making integration more tedious.
- Some users reported security concerns.
- Until recently, there was no support for basic skip patterns (available with MOSS 2007) or advanced branching.
- It has no real-time reports or dashboards and can't export results to SAV or PPT files.
SharePoint is a great interim solution for organizations first adopting web surveys. It excels at short, uncomplicated and static surveys, but organizations outgrow it when they need advanced questionnaires, intermediate MR functionality, integrated email invitations, panel management or enterprise feedback management.
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Wed, Oct 28, 2009
Chris Ferneyhough and Sonia Bishop of Vision Critical discussed best practices for fielding online surveys to mobile audiences in the ESOMAR Online Research 2009 conference. Chris began by pointing out that mobile Internet adoption outpaces desktop Internet adoption and forecasts that eventually usage of the mobile web will be 10 times usage of the traditional web.
Vision Critical asked respondents to an online survey if they had received their email invitation on their phone: 1.9% had in the US, 1.2% in UK and 3.8% in Canada. Clearly, respondents are already completing online surveys on mobile devices, even though authors have often not taken this into account. Chris mentioned that a panel registration survey for a smart phone vendor didn't actually work for that smart phone, because of the registration form's reliance on JavaScript, which was off by default on the phone: the open-ended "Other (please specify)" box was locked and disabled because it required JavaScript to enable it once the corresponding radio button was clicked. Since client-side scripting is disabled on many phones, the data your survey collected may be wrong.
Researchers need to recognize the fact that online surveys are being completed on mobile devices and need to be optimized for that medium. The wide variety of smartphones at GSMArena.com reveals hundreds of different models with dramatically different market share in different countries. Colors and fonts are implemented differently by different phones and may not be implemented at all on a smart phone: a certain color may render some text unreadable.
Many respondents are unfamiliar with their web browser or alphanumeric entry mode on their phone's keypad. Many respondents are concerned about data costs: some have unlimited data plans, others have pay-as-you-go plans. Many have low data connection speeds.
To do further research on these topics, Vision Critical studied respondents who are smartphone users and are willing to complete questionnaires on their phone. The sample was balanced and weighted on gender and age, with 500 Canadian respondents, 118 US respondents and 107 UK respondents. The survey covered attitudes towards the national economy. No significant statistical differences were found for closed-ended questions on mobile devices vs. desktop devices. For open-ended questions, of course, desktop users were more verbose.
The likelihood to participate in future surveys on mobile phones was greatest for iPhone users (47% were likely to), compared to only 34% of Blackberry users and 23% of all other smartphone users.
Sonia presented back-end mobile research best practices:
- Maximize use of the available space
- Profile your panel for smartphones, whose email addresses may vary for the phone vs. the desktop
- Identify devices and models supported by your data collection software
- Manage the process of deploying surveys to mobile panelists
And questionnaire design best practices:
- Use simpler question types
- Avoid Flash effects and JavaScript validation
- Write more concise questions and answer lists to minimize scrolling
- Put the Next button "above the fold"
- Limit survey length to 10-15 questions (unless heavily incentivized)
- Keep it simple: avoid color, grids, images, etc.
- Develop for the lowest-common denominator devices
Clearly, survey authors fielding online surveys need to take mobile users into account when developing surveys.
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Tue, Aug 25, 2009
 Brian’s post on our CE IQ survey reminded me of the survey test and review process I went through for that questionnaire. Here are the types of edits I made at each of the four levels of testing: Self-Test – “Run through the survey, answering it yourself, multiple times.” I spent five hours reviewing the questionnaire. Each time I read it, I found a new issue. My goal was to get to the point where I would self-test it and not find a single issue. Some of the items I encountered: - Upon re-reading, I found quite a few questions were worded awkwardly. I did lots of proofreading and wordsmithing to make sure questions were clear.
- I encountered a few double-barreled questions that I split into separate questions.
- I only had three skip patterns configured but upon testing discovered I had specified two of them incorrectly!
- I discovered that I didn’t have no-opinion choices on the required questions.
- I realized one rating scale was backwards from the others (choices listed from most favorable to least favorable where the rest were listed with negative choices first).
- I wanted to make sure each choose all that apply question had an “Other” choice in the list.
- I noticed things that would only bother a copy editor or someone, like me, who had done copy-editing in the past. For instance, this type on inconsistency bothered me: ending choice lists with “Other, Please specify:”, “Other (please specify)” and “Other, please specify” rather than one consistent phrase.
- On the last pass, I realized that I had asked for firmographics but no demographics.
Eventually I gave up. There was one choose all that apply question where two of the choices were mutually exclusive – that question really should have been reworded, but I noticed it on my last pass through the questionnaire and was far over my time budget for this phase of testing. Pre-Test – “Invite coworkers or friendly outsiders to take the survey.” The great thing about doing a survey with others is that the more eyes the more likely you are to catch problems. The open-source movement has an axiom for this: "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow” (also known as Linus’s Law). The bigger issue that was noticed was that the questionnaire consisted of a mix of British English and American English, which made it annoying to both Americans and Brits. CGA, one of our partners in the UK, wrote the first draft of the questionnaire, and I wrote the subsequent drafts. To clean it up and make both sides of the Pond happy, I ended up fielding the survey in U.S. English with a U.K. English translation (e.g., organization to organisation, dollars to pounds sterling, etc.). The pre-test also caught a minor font issue (serif in tables, sans serif elsewhere) that had broken a customized display theme. During the pre-test, we made sure to test the questionnaire in three browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox and Chrome). Pilot Test – “Invite 10% of the targeted list to take the survey.” I’m always nervous about sending out an invitation to my entire list of potential respondents, in case I realize one click too late that I’ve made a mistake. I sent the initial survey invitation out to 10% of the first wave of invitations, and everything went fine. Publish – “Invite the world to take the survey.” Once it was clear that the survey was running smoothly, I invited everyone on the first wave of my mailing list. Was I happy to end up spending over 8 hours testing a fairly straightforward 35-question survey? No, but I owed it to my hundreds of respondents to make the survey as streamlined and simple as possible.
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Thu, Jun 25, 2009
 I hate that every gas station near me has disabled the ability for me to set the fuel dispenser to fill the tank and then walk away, safe in the knowledge the automatic cut-off will kick in. Now I have to stand at the pump manually holding the switch on the fuel dispenser until the tank is full. No doubt this is a safety innovation in case the auto cut-off failed. In a similar way, many users of our survey software dislike the fact that the first time they publish a new survey, it goes into test mode. This is a not-so-subtle reminder that they should double-check the survey before inviting participants to respond. Did I say double-check? How about triple-check and quadruple-check? For very important surveys, you should: - Self-Test – Run through the survey, answering it yourself, multiple times.
- Pre-Test – Invite coworkers or friendly outsiders to take the survey.
- Pilot Test – Invite 10% of the targeted list to take the survey.
- Publish – Invite the world to take the survey.
Self TestHere are some of the things that I self-test or review before publishing a survey: - Question flow: Do questions proceed in a logical manner from topic to topic?
- Question wording: Is each question worded clearly and unambiguously and is it free of typos and grammatical errors? The preceding question itself would make a horrible survey question: whenever one question asks for an answer on multiple, different topics, it should be split into multiple questions.
- Question types: Do the question types match the wording? Can respondents answer both "yes" and "no", or do the choices not correspond to the question? This frequently happens when a series of questions has the same choices or scale, where one or more questions is force-fitted into a method that doesn’t work.
- Scale consistency: Are related questions using the same scale? I just edited a questionnaire this week that had two different satisfaction scales, because one was written off the top of the survey author’s head and the other was copied from the question library. Do different scales arrange items consistently from best to worst or worst to best? I once had to ignore a question in analysis because it used a 1-5 rating scale with 1=best, 5=worst, in reverse of all earlier questions; the open-ended responses made it clear that some customers used the scale as written, and others used the scale as expected based on the earlier scales. (Yet another reason to avoid numbers in favor of labels in rating questions.)
- Answer validation: Is the survey configured to enforce the validation described in each question? For instance, making sure an email address is in the format jane@example.com, that that a fill-in-the-blank question is limited to numbers or that a choose-many question has a limit to the number of choices that can be selected
- Required answers: Are required answers used sparingly but appropriately, especially for critical questions and for questions that drive skip patterns? For closed-ended questions that are required, is there an appropriate choice in each case, such as “Don’t know”, “Can’t remember” or “Not applicable”?
- Skip patterns: Do the skips and conditional branches take respondents where we intended? Editing a question can sometimes delete or invalidate skip logic.
- Errors of omission: What questions did you leave out that you should have included?
Pre-TestThat last question is particularly hard to answer in a self-test. When I am feeling very unsure of a study, or the results are strategic rather than tactical, I will pre-test it on coworkers or, even better, on a small sample of the target audience (no more than 50). I will end the survey with some questions about the survey itself, to identify areas or survey structures that were confusing or ambiguous. Pilot TestSometimes after a pre-test, I will pilot-test the survey to 10% of the participant list, in a “shakedown cruise” of what one favorite client describes as the “final draft but not the final final draft” of the questionnaire. This gives even more opportunities to catch errors before the survey goes live to the full list. PublishOk, now you can publish the survey and invite one billion people to complete it. You still missed something—trust me. Most likely something related to one of your last-minute changes. But you’ve dramatically lowered your odds of missing something major. Take it from hard-won experience: If your CEO or the CEO of your client cares about this survey, you definitely want to make sure you self-test, pre-test and pilot-test before you publish. And that’s why Vovici surveys go into test mode first. Now fill up the tank and go on a test drive before that road trip.
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Tue, May 26, 2009
One of the most frequent mistakes I see when reviewing questionnaires are poorly written scales. Novice survey authors often create their own scale rather than using the appropriate common scale. It's hard to write a good scale; instead you are better off rewording your question slightly so that you can use one of the following. | Acceptability | Not at all acceptable, Slightly acceptable, Moderately acceptable, Very acceptable, Completely acceptable | | Agreement | Completely disagree, Disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Somewhat agree, Agree, Completely agree | | Amount of Use | Never use, Almost never, Occasionally/Sometimes, Almost every time, Frequently use | | Appropriateness | Absolutely inappropriate, Inappropriate, Slightly inappropriate, Neutral, Slightly appropriate, Appropriate, Absolutely appropriate | | Awareness | Not at all aware, Slightly aware, Moderately aware, Very aware, Extremely aware | | Beliefs | Not at all true of what I believe, Slightly true of what I believe, Moderately true of what I believe, Very true of what I believe, Completely true of what I believe | | Concern | Not at all concerned, Slightly concerned, Moderately concerned, Very concerned, Extremely concerned | | Familiarity | Not at all familiar, Slightly familiar, Moderately familiar, Very familiar, Extremely familiar | | Frequency | Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always | | Importance | Not at all important, Slightly important, Moderately important, Very important, Extremely important | | Influence | Not at all influential, Slightly influential, Moderately influential, Very influential, Extremely influential | | Likelihood | Not at all likely, Slightly likely, Moderately likely, Very likely, Completely likely | | Priority | Not a priority, Low priority, Medium priority, High priority, Essential | | Probability | Not at all probable, Slightly probable, Moderately probable, Very probable, Completely probable | | Quality | Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent | | Reflect Me | Not at all true of me, Slightly true of me, Moderately true of me, Very true of me, Completely true of me | | Satisfaction (bipolar) | Completely dissatisfied, Mostly dissatisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Neither satisfied or dissatisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Mostly satisfied, Completely satisfied | | Satisfaction (unipolar) | Not at all satisfied, Slightly satisfied, Moderately satisfied, Very satisfied, Completely satisfied |
This list follows Krosnick's advice to use 5-point unipolar scales and 7-point bipolar scales.
Let me know any of your favorite scales that I omitted.
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Thu, May 21, 2009
You've chosen the list of people you want to invite to your survey. You still have a lot of hurdles to jump to get each recipient to actually take your survey:
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Wed, May 13, 2009
Some organizations, such as ecommerce sites like Amazon and EBay, are fortunate in that they have the email addresses of every single one of their customers. When they invite a random selection of customers to participate in a web survey, they can be assured that the results are truly representative of their customer base.
Most organizations are not so fortunate. A traditional B2B vendor might have the email addresses for perhaps half of its customers. A consumer brand might have email addresses for fewer than 10% of its customers. For these organizations, web surveys with random samples are only representative of the customers for whom they have email addresses. Such organizations must be very careful when presenting their results to not generalize them to all customers. Significant differences probably exist between the group of customers for which they have email addresses and the group for which they don't, especially since email addresses are typically collected as part of "loyalty" (frequent-buyer) programs. As a result, surveys of such email lists will overstate satisfaction, repurchase likelihood and willingness to recommend.
Organizations with unrepresentative email lists need to take the following steps for web-survey success: - Describe the survey not as representative of all customers but of the target population for which the organization has email addresses.
- Work with the marketing department to increase the percent of customers and prospects who have provided email addresses.
- Conduct a telephone study or paper survey of customers for which your organization doesn't have email addresses to determine their demographics, firmographics and attitudes. This can be used to contrast this group with the group accessible by email.
- Conduct more-frequent surveys of members of the customer loyalty program. Such programs typically use email for most communication.
- Don't put faith in polls placed on your corporate web site; such polls are unrepresentative.
What steps have you taken to make sure that your web surveys are representative of your customer base?
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Wed, Apr 29, 2009
Your survey invitation gets past the spam filters and shows up in someone's email inbox. Now the recipient will have two or three items at hand to decide whether to click Delete or to open your message:
- From field - The From field consists of the sending email address and the alias for that address. Nothing will get your email deleted faster than having an impersonal email address without an alias, such as - a particular favorite! - noreply@example.com. Always include the alias. What type of alias works best varies by organization; examples to experiment with for your invitations include:
- The name of an individual - The name of an employee managing the survey or commissioning the survey can be very effective.
- The name of the brand or company - While this can be impersonal, it may outperform the names of individuals for B2B vendors.
- Brand name + "Surveys" - For some organizations a From field such as "Acme Surveys" works best.
- Hybrid - Some panel companies test combinations such as "Acme Surveys & Jane Doe".
- Subject line - The text of the subject line will have the biggest impact: "Your Feedback Needed", "Some Quick Questions for You", "Help Us Serve You Better", "Learn What Your Peers Think About -----" are all subject lines that have been successful for survey invitations. Your organization will need to experiment to determine what works best for your audience.
- First line of the invitation - Some email programs display the first line of the invitation in grayed-out text immediately after a bold subject line. All the more reason to pay special attention to the copy you use in the body of your invitation.
What tactics have improved your organization's open rate on surveys?
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Tue, Apr 21, 2009
Sift out the finer distinctions and most questionnaires are constructed from four basic building blocks. These four, fundamental question types are:
| Open-ended questions | Essay Questions | Long text responses |
|---|
| Fill-in-the-Blank Questions | Short text responses | | Closed-ended questions | Choose-One Questions | Single choice selected |
|---|
| Choose-Many Questions | Multiple choices selected |
Essay QuestionThe essay question, in a web survey, is displayed as a multi-line TEXTAREA: 
Respondents can enter a few words, a few paragraphs, and even a few pages. Typically essay questions store 32,000 to 64,000 characters of text. We've had respondents copy and paste dozens of pages of text into essay questions.
This question type is best used for understanding in detail what a respondent believes in their own words. Fill-in-the-Blank QuestionA fill-in-the-blank question is displayed as one or more text boxes with short labels, and is designed for gathering short responses:

It can also be used for contact information or address information: 
Responses to text boxes are often validated to follow a common pattern. Common validations include:
- Email address
- Whole number within a range
- Real number within a range
- Date
- Telephone number - U.S./Canadian format or international format
- Zip codes and postal codes
Choose-One QuestionThe most common question type is that of the single-select multiple-choice question, where a respondent chooses one and only one of the available options. Choose-one questions are typically shown with radio buttons or dropdown boxes. While choose-one questions constrain the choices of the respondent, they are much quicker to answer and much easier to analyze. Choose-Many QuestionsThe multiple-select multiple-choice question allows the respondent to check all the choices that are applicable to the question. Most survey software uses the standard checkboxes of HTML forms to show these questions: These four questions can then be combined together in matrix questions. For best practices for each type of question, see these posts:
Posted by Jeffrey Henning on Fri, Apr 17, 2009
You've gotten the recipient to jump all the hurdles to get to the survey except for the last one - reading the invitation and clicking on the survey link.
You now have the challenge of writing a short but motivating invitation that will prompt your recipient to become a respondent.
As with any attempt at marketing, you have less than eight seconds to make a first impression. A clever use of images can help catch people's attention. You need to tell recipients what you want them to do as soon as possible in the invitation. Know your audience and write the invitation with this knowledge in mind. Keep the invitation short-but cover the key points.
Patrick Glaser's "A Playbook for Creating Survey Introductions for Online Panels" provides a useful outline for a survey invitation, along with example phrases.
I wish I could give you some proven catchphrases for subject lines that work with every survey, but what worked once--"Help us improve our products" or "Share your opinion"--might not work on the next round of survey invitations to the same audience. Experimentation and inventiveness are essential.
Do not make privacy claims that you may not keep. This tends to happen by mistake rather than from any intention to mislead recipients. Often you are surveying your customer base and will want to set up survey alerts and email triggers so that you can respond directly to dissatisfied customers to address their problems; don't then tell them in the invitation that their survey responses will only be used when aggregated with other responses.
Similarly, do not offer incentives that you can't deliver. Again, this tends to happen by mistake, when an organization promises every respondent a reward, then has far more awards than imagined. See last week's post for strategies for survey incentives.
All Posts
Error sending email
Email sent successfully
|