Survey Software, Web Survey, Online Surveys, and Enterprise Feedback Management solutions from Vovici

Voice of Vovici Blog
Survey Research & Enterprise Feedback Management

   Contact Us       Customer Login       Support    Blog  
 

Experience Vovici :: request a callExperience Vovici :: request a callExperience Vovici :: request a demo

Subscribe to our Blog


Your email address

VISION 2010 :: Vovici User Conference :: Save the Date :: May 10-12, 2010

Download your free copy our eBook: Survey Software Success

Free EBook!

We've compiled much of the blog into a free, 73-page ebook, Survey Software Success. The book outlines seven best practices for conducting online surveys.

> Download your free copy

Solutions For:

Online Survey Solutions Voice of the Customer SolutionsMarket Research Solutions Customer Support Solutions Voice of the Employee Solutions Government Solutions

Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Net Promoter Score’s Angels & Demons

 | Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Facebook Facebook | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Net Promoter Score’s Angels & DemonsThere’s something devilish in the air. Wednesday night my wife and I watched a Dr. Who episode involving a demon, Thursday afternoon I attended a webinar where Fred Reichheld said market researchers thought he was the devil, and this morning my son complained that his camping trip meant he was going to miss tonight's premiere of Angels & Demons.

Since you probably don’t care about my family’s viewing habits, let’s turn to Fred’s presentation. Fred showed a slide with his face superimposed onto a cartoon devil, claiming that he has become the enemy of traditional market researchers. Among the criticisms he reported:

HornsNet Promoter Score® oversimplifies customer loyalty
HornsNPS is a score that doesn’t provide solutions
HornsMarket researchers have proprietary indices with greater validity
HornsNPS is hazardous to your business
HornsNPS does not correlate to growth
HornsFred is dumb or lying

Well, presenting an oversimplification of legitimate criticism of NPS is one way to attempt to inoculate your listeners from paying attention to that criticism. I thought it was amusing, but I will play along. In fact, I will play devil’s advocate and give Fred halos instead of horns for these contributions to loyalty research:

Halo Discovering that customer retention is a key driver of profitability (q.v., Reichheld, Frederick F. (1993), “Loyalty-Based Management,” Harvard Business Review, 71 (2), 64–73)
Halo Promoting the importance of very short surveys
Halo Championing the need for a common loyalty measure across the enterprise
Halo Pointing out that a 0-10 scale is an intuitive scale for telephone research, since—unlike a 1-10 scale—the 0 is unambiguously the worst score
Halo Advocating the firing of staff who cheat on their customer-feedback numbers and discouraging organizations from tying that feedback to compensation
Halo Making NPS free

That last is important. As he said: “NPS is an 'open source' system: you are all welcome to use it! You don't have to pay me to use it.” (I could have done without his next statement: “Therefore its bad business for market research, and why they call me a liar.”) But if you’ve ever gone to implement the five questions of the Secure Customer Index® or the one question of the Customer Effort Score and realized you couldn’t because they are proprietary, you’ll appreciate that there are no such restrictions on the Net Promoter Score.

Oh, and even if you liked the book (Angels & Demons, not The Ultimate Question), my advice is to skip the movie. This review of Angels & Demons said it all for me: "Hanks returns to the dullest role of his career, under the direction of Howard, who takes the material as seriously as a kidney stone on the way out." As for Fred, I’ll leave it to you to decide whether he is an angel or demon.


[All trademarks are properties of their respective holders. Vovici makes no claim to any of these registered or common-law marks.]

Comments

"Pointing out that a 0-10 scale is an intuitive scale for telephone research, since—unlike a 1-10 scale—the 0 is unambiguously the worst score"  
 
Unfortunately this doesn't work on an automated telephone survey, as you can only go 0 to 9 on the keypad. Do you have any suggestions about that?
Posted @ Friday, June 12, 2009 1:32 PM by Rob McDougall
I was reading your post and thinking that I as not going to respond. After all, I gave Fred enough grief last time. 
 
However, there is one more thought on what he said. He said that since it is "Open Source" that anyone can do what they want to it. Which is interesting, not sure someone else will do something to it, but an interesting approach. 
 
My problem is not whether it is open source or not: it is the fact it exists. Sure, it can be modified by anyone any way they want... but why does it exist? 
 
His argument is similar to what arms and cigarettes manufacturers say constantly. Sure, it is in the realm of the customer to stop purchasing and using, but why make it in the first place? Same thing applies to NPS - if you create a "method" for organizations to measure themselves to each other, and to oversimplify their measurement initiatives -- do you really think they won't use it? 
 
NPS should not exist, whether open source or not; any system that leverages just one question, or one concept to be repeated without regard for personalization should not exist. 
 
And, I will give Fred his due, as you did, and concur with his accomplishments. Just don't like the NPS stuff... bad legacy.
Posted @ Friday, June 12, 2009 1:33 PM by Esteban Kolsky
After 25+ years of trying to keep and grow customers I cannot agree more that a one question survey (i.e. NPS) does little more than tell you what you should have already known.I only wish that the suppliers to our organization (like our office space landlord) would make building, measuring and optimizing loyalty between us and them a more critical component of the relationship - and there is nothing wrong with asking your customers many more precise questions to better understand how to be there for them in the future - auto, healthcare and airline industries are you listening? This approach goes way beyond consumers and deep into the B-to-B world which has really been affected by globaliazation and turning relationships into commodities. 
 
In a world that is depending on statistics to determine trends and the future - the greater the sample and the more accurate the data points we have, will greatly influence the accuracy of our predictions - especially when trying to determine customer retention; i.e. loyalty - Dennis
Posted @ Sunday, June 14, 2009 3:34 PM by Dennis J. Chapman Sr.
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.