Survey Software, Web Survey, Online Surveys, and Enterprise Feedback Management solutions from Vovici

Your email:
   

Welcome to the Listening Post!

Your single source for everything Voice of the Customer (VoC) and Customer Experience (CxP). And, don’t forget you can follow us on twitter @vovici, or come check us out on Facebook and join the Vovici Network on LinkedIn.

 

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

The Backlash against Voice of the Customer Research

 
sculptor

Whenever Steve Jobs introduces a new product (what, you didn't buy your iPad Saturday, either?), I am immediately inundated with comments to the effect of: "Since Apple does no market research, we don't have to do any either." And someone will bring up Henry Ford on market research: "If I asked my customers what they want, they simply would have said a faster horse." Now, even the Marketing Leadership Roundtable of the Corporate Executive Board is saying things like, "The Problem with VOC? The Customer Isn't Always Right."

This backlash against the Voice of the Customer is completely misplaced. The mistake is assuming that the Voice of the Customer itself has all the answers. VOC is an input, not an output.

Voice of the Customer data is the chunk of marble from which you must carve out a new product design. You collect your VOC data through surveys, online communities, support calls and other listening posts. Once you have the data, you need to discard commentary that doesn't apply to the focus of your current work, just as you need to use a heavy chisel to rough out the stone. Take all the comments you received, look for common themes and use an internal cross-functional team to select the 20 or so most important functional requirements. As a sculptor sees shapes in stone, you need to see ideas in Voice of the Customer comments, becoming skilled at interpretation, understanding what customers really want, for instance, when they say "a faster horse". Then turn that interpretation and analysis into a survey of customers to have them weigh the relative importance of the top requirements you teased out of the rock.

Next, come up with product designs and benchmark them against the customer requirements, rating each product for how well they meet or exceed expectations for each requirement. A few features will stand out from the rest for seeming to meet the most important requirements best. This is how a breakthrough product like the original iPod Shuffle can be born; the Shuffle sacrificed the previous perceived must-have requirements of a display screen, applications and games in an MP3 player with the new must-have requirements of low price and a light weight.

Once you have a design for a product or service that appears to do the best at meeting prioritized requirements, determine how much of it can actually be created. For products, engineering limitations may introduce tradeoffs (for instance, light tablet computers with long battery life, since long-lasting batteries add weight). You will need to cycle back and forth between the ideal design and the practical design, chipping away stone bit by bit.

Only through the use of the proper tools and processes can you carve a beautiful product out of the stone of Voice of the Customer data. Resist the backlash against Voice of the Customer research and see it for what it really is: the essential foundation of successful product and service development.

Comments

Of course, as we all know, the idea that Apple does no market research is a myth. Apple does, in fact, have a market research department. The quote from SJ is about product concept testing research--and is widely taken out of context.  
 
What I do see, however, are product research cases that use research as an output (as you say). We must always triangulate the results of a single study with other data points and contextual information. No single study is the be all/end all to key questions such as "what features should this new product have?" or "how likely is this concept to be adopted by our target market?"
Posted @ Monday, April 05, 2010 6:39 AM by Kathryn Korostoff
The other key message here is that all VOC is not "anything" - it can range from nonsense to ahead-of-the-curve thinking. We also need to look at the diffusion of innovations curve to understand that there are innovators, early adopters, etc. that can be very forward looking and not just think of a "horse". In most research, there are very few studies that are dispositive in their own right - see the rise of meta-analyses to use the study as a unit of research and comparison. Master status descriptions are almost always wrong given the inductive approach to most research, which can usually be meaningfully stratified.
Posted @ Monday, April 05, 2010 7:28 AM by Michael
You may be surprised to learn that there is a comprehensive marketing resesarch process today for identifying and defining what customers want in a product or service (the qualitative stage) and for their prioritization and evaluation of current products' capability in providing what they want (the quantitative phase). This process has been developed and refined by my good friends at Turtle Bay Institute (Princeton, NJ). I have used it to identify a multibillion dollar consumer product opportunity and for obtaining answers to management questions before they are even asked. If your business is developing a new product that has to done right the first time, there is no more powerfull procedure than this to assure your success. Further more, the process can be completed before you invest a dime in building prototypes. 
 
Curious? Then, let us continue the dialogue. 
 
Posted @ Monday, April 05, 2010 10:09 AM by Robert Burian
The "Voice of the Customer" as a named concept came from the Total Quality Management movement of the 80's as the critical input to Quality Function Deployment (QFD). At that time it had a very specific meaning: customer wants and needs. Not the solutions and not the metrics that an engineer would use, but the metrics that customers use to tell if they are satisfied. These are the needs you hear when you ask customers "why do you want that?" or "why is that better?" Too many people think all market research is VOC research. We all need to stand up for what VOC really means and keep telling the detractors that until they understand what will make their customers happy, their next new product will just be a crap shoot.
Posted @ Monday, April 05, 2010 4:45 PM by Bob Klein
I agree with Bob Klein that Quality Function Deployment and its House of Quality matrix calls for a powerful and comprehensive picture of customer wants, needs and priorities. This matrix links design specifications with market requirements and opportunities. It brings together the product desing team and the marketing team (who are often at odds with each other) together in a common understanding of how the new product design wil give prospective customers more of what the3y are looking for.
Posted @ Tuesday, April 06, 2010 10:11 AM by Robert Burian
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Latest Posts

Loading
What's New
Get on the Path to Customer Experience Success
VoC on Twitter
Verint Blog
Verint Blog: Read the Latest from the Verint Systems Blog