Survey Software, Web Survey, Online Surveys, and Enterprise Feedback Management solutions from Vovici

Your email:
   

Welcome to the Listening Post!

Your single source for everything Voice of the Customer (VoC) and Customer Experience (CxP). And, don’t forget you can follow us on twitter @vovici, or come check us out on Facebook and join the Vovici Network on LinkedIn.

 

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Panel Management Lessons from Panel Professionals

 
salmon run

Many unscrupulous sites, typically unaffiliated with the panel providers themselves, champion that you can make easy money at home taking surveys, and this drives a lot of panelists to sign up with mercenary intentions.

What sort of incentives are offered panelists? In our Lessons from Professional Panel Providers study, 47% of the panels have point-based systems that can be redeemed for gifts, gift certificates or cash. Another 47% pay in vouchers and gift cards, with 27% offering cash for surveys. Thirty percent (30%) offer donations to a charity of the panelist's choice. Financial incentives for survey results end up creating significant concerns about the quality of survey answers (see Data Quality & Validation Lessons).

Incentive philosophies and approaches vary widely from panel provider to panel provider:

  • "The incentives have been set to encourage long term participation but also to discourage participation for payment purposes only." - Cint
  • "Even though incentives are offered, panelists are unlikely to net any significant amount of money in the aggregate during the year based on limited frequency of participation." - Nielsen
  • "Points systems are recognized as being the best in class in online market research, as they are seen as a neutral system which does not skew the participation of specific groups of people." - Ipsos Mori
  • "SSI's philosophy is not to use a ‘one size fits all' reward system. Instead, SSI offers the reward which best suits a specific survey project and that is most likely to appeal to a diverse community of respondents." - SSI
  • "From our viewpoint this is very much ‘horses for courses', meaning that incentives should vary to the circumstance and objective of the survey. We do not presently have a ‘loyalty' scheme - we vary the incentive according to the project." - Sample Answers
  • "The incentive varies between two to three dollars per minute based upon specialty and length of survey." - MDLinx (panel of healthcare professionals) [non-medical surveys, in contrast, typically are $2-3 per survey]
  • "In certain cases (certain unique target groups) the incentive could be a product, tickets or a subscription that is relevant to the nature of the target group." - Focus Suites
  • "Peanut Labs offers community based incentives that are different for every respondent - think of it as a customized incentive based on personal preferences and affinity. These incentives are controlled by the social network or community partner that the respondent comes from." - Peanut Labs

Panels reported that 11% of panelists on average left the panel each year. To minimize this attrition, panels limit the number of surveys that a panelist can take anywhere from 1 survey per month to 8 surveys per month, with 3.5 per month being the average.

survey frequency 

What Panel Pros Can Teach Us about Panel Management

  1. Limit the number of surveys to 1 or 2 per panelist per month. Almost a quarter of the panels that specified a limit claim not to survey panelists more than once a month on average. If that is a good practice for professional panels, it seems like excellent advice for panels of customers.
  2. Calculate annualized attrition rate as a KPI. The rate of members unsubscribing from the panel is an excellent Key Performance Indicator: high attrition diminishes the representativeness of the panel and is a sign that you are inviting members to surveys too often and typically to surveys that are too long.
  3. Provide awards not rewards. Incentive systems can corrupt data quality; such systems are necessary for general purpose panels where the panel has no pre-existing relationship with the panelists, but financial incentives should not be necessary when researching customers. Customers agree to take surveys out of social norms rather than market norms; accordingly, instead of promising rewards for future behavior provide awards to recognize past survey-taking behavior. Sharing top-line results is an especially effective thank you for completing a survey.

Want to learn more? For the full results of this study, download our white paper, Panel Management Secrets: Lessons from the Professionals, or view our recorded research webinar of the same name.

Comments

Currently, there are no comments. Be the first to post one!
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Latest Posts

Loading
What's New
Don't Be in the 4%
VoC on Twitter
Verint Blog
Verint Blog: Read the Latest from the Verint Systems Blog