Survey Software, Web Survey, Online Surveys, and Enterprise Feedback Management solutions from Vovici

Your email:
   

Welcome to the Listening Post!

Your single source for everything Voice of the Customer (VoC) and Customer Experience (CxP). And, don’t forget you can follow us on twitter @vovici, or come check us out on Facebook and join the Vovici Network on LinkedIn.

 

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Centralized vs. Decentralized Research: The Verdict Is In

 
typing pool

My "Tweet Off" compatriots Kathryn Korostoff of Research Rockstar (@ResearchRocks) and Cathy Harrison (@VirtualMR) of Chadwick Martin Bailey are bickering again, and Cathy has invited me to issue a verdict on their argument:

  • In Market Research Decentralization: Power to the People, Kathryn argues that the biggest problem facing market researchers today is that their research findings do not inspire action. By involving coworkers in the research process, from start to finish, letting them even do much of the research, they will be more likely to take action on the results. As decentralization occurs, market research departments need to rethink their goals: they should provide resources to coworkers doing research (e.g., "standardized questionnaire templates, sample sources, in-house panels and communities"), provide training, create and enforce policies for such research, while continuing to manage complex studies centrally.
  • In Be Wary of Decentralizing the Corporate Market Research Function, Cathy's concern is not that action isn't being taken but that decentralized research will inspire the wrong actions. She says that market research seems simple enough for coworkers to take on themselves, but only because of "not knowing what they don't know". This anosognosia can lead to poorly designed surveys that lead organizations to decisions that damage the brand, the relationship with customers and corporate profitability. Centralized research departments serve as "a hub of dedicated professionals who work closely together and share information", providing "a holistic view of their target audience and building synergies across projects".

Well, Cathy, I'm old enough to have seen this movie before. I'm sure the folks in the typing pool who had spent years learning touch typing and had high words per minute thought their department would always be needed, especially after everyone was upgraded from typewriters to Wang word processor systems. I fondly recall the graphic arts department, whose staff certainly produced more attractive looking presentations than I do without them. I remember the MIS department complaining as executives and staff brought in IBM Personal Computers behind their backs. And the finance department was none too pleased when executives began doing their own modeling with VisiCalc. The market research department that wants to remain relevant should follow some of the nuanced advice that Kathryn offers.

Because the irreversible long-term trend is towards providing employees the software to help them better do their own jobs: from typing, to writing presentations, to crunching numbers, to doing surveys.

Do you think you have a research specialty so complex that it is immune to this? For instance, say you have industry benchmarking data and sophisticated modeling algorithms that put the potential of the retail sales opportunity for new products into perspective. Well, sorry, but Skuuber is an automated system that packages just that expertise for $4500: far cheaper than a custom consulting study. If you thought Do-It-Yourself surveys were bad for researchers, wait until you see the growing number of narrow research applications that will automate those tasks you thought required your expertise.

In 1996, Perseus Development was two people: my business partner Rich Nadler and myself, providing CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing) software to market research firms and departments. When I told Rich that eventually web surveys would be as ubiquitous as presentation software, he thought I was crazy. A year later he had warmed to the idea, and we released SurveySolutions for the Web. We rode the survey decentralization trend to 50 employees before we sold the company to Austin Ventures in 2006.

Sorry, Cathy, the verdict is in, but I didn't deliver it. End users did. Today, more surveys are done outside market research departments and market research firms than inside them. The days of the traditional market research department are numbered; they just haven't been counting them down.

Comments

I knew from the get-go having a survey software developer make a verdict on the decentralization topic was bound not to be in my favor. :) However, your blog is so popular (and one of my favorites BTW) that I thought it would be worth a verdict in Kathryn's favor to fan the flames of dialogue. 
 
 
 
Pa-LEEZE Jeffrey - you are comparing today's centralized market research department to an outdated typing pool? It does not take specialized knowledge to replicate typed words or to create simple graphics using new technology. On the other hand, market research is a profession that takes years to master and even then 'the more you know, the more you realize you don't know' and one must try to stay ahead of the curve (so, my answer is a resounding yes to your question about complexity). 
 
 
 
Access to the tool does not equal knowledge. The non-researcher will no doubt get a result after pushing the button but they won't know when the output is incorrect or that the resulting conclusions are erroneous. There tends to be idiosyncrasies with each dataset and/or set up of the analytics that a non-researcher would not be able to correctly deal with without extensive training and experience. An example I have seen firsthand is output from SPSS. The non-researcher did not know about properly preparing the data (cleaning, backcoding, assigning values to missing data), defining the levels of measurement (nominal or ordinal), how to choose/prepare variables for analytics, and how to correctly interpret the results (including knowing when you need to go back and tweak things).  
 
 
 
Occasionally there may be repetitive analytic tasks that do not need to be housed in the market research department, but these are the exception. Most companies I have worked with have a diversified and unique set of business questions that require a wide range of methodological approaches and analytic techniques to answer. A centralized research department is the best way to expertly and cost effectively meet these needs.
Posted @ Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:11 PM by Cathy Harrison
Having grown up in advertising and then moving to the client-side, I have had a "front row" seat for this transition for art directors, designers, copywriters, researchers and account managers. 
 
 
 
All aspects of marketing "looks easy, does hard." At least if you do it right. 
 
 
 
Today I'm concerned with the reliance on analytics without the consumer insights to add a depth of perspective and understanding. I strive to get a job with a firm that values consumer insights; however, I'm beginning to wonder if there's a place for someone with 30 years of experience in 18 vertical industries. If not, time to reposition my personal brand.
Posted @ Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:32 PM by Tom Smith
I think the brutal reality is captured here: "Today, more surveys are done outside market research departments and market research firms than inside them." The genie is out of the bottle, thanks to the increasing number, and usefulness, of tools. Let's train them, give them policies, and support them: saying "no" is neither productive nor realistic.
Posted @ Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:15 PM by Ka
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Latest Posts

Loading
What's New
Don't Be in the 4%
VoC on Twitter
Verint Blog
Verint Blog: Read the Latest from the Verint Systems Blog