Survey Software, Web Survey, Online Surveys, and Enterprise Feedback Management solutions from Vovici

Your email:
   

Welcome to the Listening Post!

Your single source for everything Voice of the Customer (VoC) and Customer Experience (CxP). And, don’t forget you can follow us on twitter @vovici, or come check us out on Facebook and join the Vovici Network on LinkedIn.

 

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Online Research Communities by Type

 
community

Traditionally when people have discussed different types of MROCs (market research online communities), they've focused on the size of the community, whether or not membership was open or closed, and whether or not it was fully managed or self-service.

When Brad Bortner, a Forrester analyst, defined the term as "dedicated online communities for qualitative market research purposes", he clearly had in mind standing communities, and he saw MROCs as counterpoints to standing online communities built for marketing.

But the temporal dimension - is this a temporary or permanent community? - has become more important to consider. General Mills has shifted from a permanent MROC to temporary online communities for specific projects, finding that they are less expensive and don't require ongoing maintenance (in the terms of qualitative exercises that keep the community engaged, a problem that has been reported by Wendy'sABC Studios and others).

As research hubs for online qualitative techniques, MROCs take many different forms, as this chart illustrates. (The size of each bubble reflects the relative size of the typical community of that type.)

MROC types

Here are six prominent types of online research communities:

  • Permanent
    • Insight Community - Closed, standing communities of 300-500 members, with a high degree of community, as members build relationships with one another. Excellent source for deep, qualitative insights that aren't easily available in larger, less intimate groups.
    • Community Panel - An adjunct to an online panel, where only some panelists engage in discussions with one another. The community may be either public or private. Typical sizes range from 10,000 to 100,000 members, who have weak relationships with one another. Qualitative insights raised within the community site can be tested for representativeness using surveys of the panel (assuming, of course, the panel itself is representative of a target audience).
    • Idea Voting - Adjuncts to web sites where visitors may submit ideas and vote and comment on one another's ideas. Participating visitors have almost no relationship to one another. Idea voting generates a tremendous volume of new ideas, which then require extensive vetting and prioritization.
  • Temporary
    • Idea Jam - Three-day long community built specifically for ideation, leveraging offline relationships of an existing community (employees, business partners, resellers, customers). Some innovation jams have had hundreds of thousands of participants. Jams are the equivalent of a brainstorming session, serving as the kickoff for planning exercises.
    • BBFG - Private groups with typically 30-50 participants discussing focused topic areas. Bulletin Board Focus Groups run by iTracks typically last for three to seven days, though some are managed for two to twelve months. Members can build a sense of community over that time period.
    • OLFG - Online group chats that last for a few hours. Arguably the small size and short duration of Online Focus Groups should exclude them from even being included in a discussion of MROCs, but they are shown here for completeness.

Is this a useful segmentation? Are there important types of online research communities that I'm omitting? Would you compare and contrast communities differently?

Comments

Jeff - very good descriptions. I think there may be a place for one more type of community that may be viewed as a insight community, or sub-category of it, but differs in the number of members and length of time they run - fewer participants than a community (<100) and run from 6 weeks to 6 months. Highly focused, less maintenance, highly engaged because of smaller size and less time for burn-out. My feelings/experience tell me these are growing in popularity and work better in the context of Qualitative Market Research.
Posted @ Thursday, July 01, 2010 11:00 AM by Monica Zinchiak
Nice one Jeff, nice definitions a great starting point. I guess an important point to make is that communities run across the whole spectrum of openness, permanency & size and whilst the definitions highlight some well known types there's a whole world of variation around them.  
 
For example I've run projects which are in the the 'insight community' category but have many thousands of members ('community panel size') because we have lots of different sub groups chatting to each other about a range of topics. Another example is running a closed idea voting type site for employees within a organisation.
Posted @ Friday, July 02, 2010 9:34 AM by Rich Shaw
Tamara Barber of Forrester made some good points: 
To MROC or not MROC: That's the Question. I agree with her that the segmentation shown above doesn't emphasize the strength of community -- I think by simply reversing the axis for open/closed this can be accomplished: 
http://twitpic.com/21ui2f 
 
I've also de-emphasized OLFGs, as Jim Longo and others seem to agree that they are in no sense communities.
Posted @ Friday, July 02, 2010 3:44 PM by Jeffrey Henning
This is a great starting point Jeff, congratulations. My only concern, however, is the definition of Community Panels. I see these as being traditional quantitative panels which have simply siffened off a select number of individuals for either a BBFG, Idea Jam or OLFG. In this sense, I don't see it as a standalone type of community, rather a combination of old world and new world qual and quant research methodologies and techniques, remembering that communities have a focus on 'conversations', which often quant doesn't.
Posted @ Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:45 AM by Stephen Cribbett
Hi Jeffrey, I've posted up some additional thoughts in this subject here http://bit.ly/btEK4x
Posted @ Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:49 AM by Stephen Cribbett
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Latest Posts

Loading
What's New
Lessons from 2012 Voice of the Customer award winners
VoC on Twitter
Verint Blog
Verint Blog: Read the Latest from the Verint Systems Blog