Survey Software, Web Survey, Online Surveys, and Enterprise Feedback Management solutions from Vovici

Your email:
   

Welcome to the Listening Post!

Your single source for everything Voice of the Customer (VoC) and Customer Experience (CxP). And, don’t forget you can follow us on twitter @vovici, or come check us out on Facebook and join the Vovici Network on LinkedIn.

 

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Estimating Willingness to Pay

 

price tag with question markDavid Lyon of Aurora Market Modeling is a regular presenter at the American Marketing Association’s annual Applied Research Methods conference, teaching a class on “Survey-based Approaches to Pricing Research”. He begins his class with a discussion of the most basic technique, but one that survey authors often get wrong: Willingness to Pay (WTP).

First, the questionnaire describes the new product or service in detail, then asks the user, “How much would you be willing to pay for this?”

It’s better not to provide a list of possible prices for the respondent to choose from: make it an open-ended question. A list of prices biases the answers. Dave shared the example of a space tourism survey, conducted before multimillionaires decided to spend tens of millions of dollars to go up on Russian spacecraft. The prices given were $1,000, $2,000, $3,000 and $4,000 – low for what many seem willing to pay (Virgin Galactic will be offering suborbital flights at $200,000).

When analyzing the results, don’t use averages but plot the cumulative percent willing to pay at any given price: for example, if respondents answered $5, $10, $15 and $20, any respondent that answered $15 is also willing to pay $5 and $10.

Willingness to pay is a lousy direct question to ask respondents, who tend to lowball their answers, in effect bargaining rather than answering accurately.  Nor, given the artificialness of the exercise, are their answers likely to reflect their actual behavior. As a result, use this technique for those times when you really have no idea what people are willing to pay and treat it as an input into further research. Since it is an input, you can—and should—use a small sample size. Then test the results with other techniques, exploring price points that are above the Willingness-to-Pay answers.

willingness to pay

Regarding those other techniques, David presented extensively on the merits of using direct questioning and trade-off methods for pricing research. The Applied Research Methods conference is atypical of U.S. MR conferences – it’s actually a series of 2-hour and 4-hour classes on a range of research topics. This year I’ll be teaching classes on Panel & Community Management and on Pragmatic Social Media Research. You can learn more at the ARM 2011 web site.

Comments

Jeffrey 
I agree with David Lyon and your statement that it is a lousy direct question to ask. Measuring attitudinal WTP is almost always wrong. While it is true that attitudinal WTP will be an underestimate when presenting multiple price options, it is usually an overestimate of behavioral WTP. 
 
I do not recommend the open ended question as well. For one thing it suffers from same attitude-behavior gap and the other customers simply may not know the price. There is also the possibility that there are unstated value factors that are not considered. There are better analytical methods like conjoint analysis or a modified Vickrey auction to find WTP of different segments and the demand curve for each segment. 
 
While economists view WTP a fixed number and we all know ours, it rarely is. It varies based on purchase occasion, whose paying for it, context, alternatives etc. 
 
Regards 
 
-rags
Posted @ Wednesday, January 26, 2011 10:29 PM by Rags Srinivasan
The Von Westendorp battery of pricing questions is much more objective and offers more depth behind pricing decisions.
Posted @ Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:52 AM by Steve Seiferheld
Great advice, and I would also caution to only ask the question: 
- if someone is genuinely interested in buying 
- if they also care about the price 
 
As Rags alludes to, the trick with pricing is to segment consumers to get sensible answers, including based on context 
 
Neil
Posted @ Monday, January 31, 2011 9:12 AM by Neil Gains
I agree with Rags in regards to refraining from the use of open-ended WTP responses. Depending on how many attributes you want to change in each choice set I would consider using a Multiple Price List or conjoint analysis. Multiple price lists allow for ease of instruction to participants but you will end up having interval WTP responses whereas conjoint analysis may be a little more complicated, yet you can design it appropriately to your needs. 
 
Also, if possible, you should try and make it non-hypothetical since your WTP amounts will always be inflated due to the typical hypothetical nature of surveys.  
 
Best of luck!  
 
Posted @ Friday, February 04, 2011 1:43 PM by Tyler Klain
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Latest Posts

Loading
What's New
Don't Be in the 4%
VoC on Twitter
Verint Blog
Verint Blog: Read the Latest from the Verint Systems Blog