Survey Software, Web Survey, Online Surveys, and Enterprise Feedback Management solutions from Vovici

Your email:
   

Welcome to the Listening Post!

Your single source for everything Voice of the Customer (VoC) and Customer Experience (CxP). And, don’t forget you can follow us on twitter @vovici, or come check us out on Facebook and join the Vovici Network on LinkedIn.

 

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Panel Ponds along the River of Information

 

describe the imageThanks to Eisenhower’s admiration of the autobahn, and his desire for an interstate highway system to rival it, I grew up on a 10-acre manmade lake. My grandfather’s farm was excavated to construct the embankment of the Interstate 80 turnpike in Ohio. The excavators must have hit a natural spring, for they came back one weekend to find their quarry was now a lake. My grandfather stocked it with fish, and decades later I could walk out of my house and fish whenever I wanted.

This was brought to mind as I thought of the ARF’s vision of market research in 2021: researchers as stewards of a “river of information” for the firms they work for. Rather than think in terms of commissioning projects to answer marketing questions, researchers of the future will oversee processes that will provide ongoing feedback as well as places to fish for additional information. In this vision, sometimes they will look to social media streams of information, but other times they will turn to ponds they’ve stocked with fish.

“Information ponds” such as house panels. Market researchers have typically thought of themselves as consumers of respondent lists – whether rented externally or generated internally by IT or other departments. Have a new survey? Get a new list. Unfortunately, eventually researchers see that the lists aren’t as good as they used to be and that response rates have declined.

If anyone in the company was a steward of mailing lists, it was the marketing department, which would be concerned about overfishing – er, oversending to the list – and which would be concerned about list quality. Marketing can no longer be the only steward of this natural resource. For purposes of survey research, list quality is now an ongoing concern of market researchers as well: they need to build a house panel and act as a steward to the company’s use of respondents for survey research. Like conservationists, researchers need to make sure that they are not oversurveying respondents and that the list quality is representative of the target markets being studied.

Yes, you can go to the river to fish. But the river is a communal resource. People dump refuse in it upstream. Factories pollute the river with social media spam, automated bots and links to blog posts shilling products. I’m not about to eat a fish caught from the Cuyahoga, and you can’t always be certain that the information you “caught” in social media nets hasn’t been polluted by competitors or market participants. Take such information as qualitative and possibly directional, but verify the representativeness of such views by fishing in well-stocked ponds that you manage and understand. House panels are an important part of the transformation of research from projects to processes and are important resources in the watershed along the “river of information”.

Comments

AMEN! This has been a problem for years. I am currently fighting a losing battle within my organization to implement a survey fatigue policy - who wanted me and some of my peers to put together an in-house course on how to do Zoomerangs. When we said that it wasn't that easy - people have to frame their project - establish valid objectives, etc and determine the best method to obtain this info BEFORE they sit down to create a questionnaire. Long story short, the project has stalled indefinitely. There has to be a central gatekeeper to monitor DIY projects so they don't polute the respondent pool (or cast a bad impression of the organization because of shoddy work). The gatekeeper also has to allocate and monitor the respondent pool to eliminate abuse.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 18, 2011 10:01 AM by Jeff Morton
Jeffrey, 
 
I love your posts on the "river of information" and quite agree with the concept.  
 
I just wanted to add to this one a slight modifier, if you may. I agree that you can never be entirely sure of the quality of the data you caught from the river of information (as far as the authenticity and quality), but no sane person or company would take that river to be the only source of data. you can use that data to point you to specific trends, patterns, and other areas to explore further - but you will then use other tools (more focused on real interactions and communities, or deeper level surveys as examples) to further explore the issue. 
 
that further exploration, that could be quite promptly done if the proper tools are in place, is what will drive the value from today's investments in social: social data spots the trends magnitudes faster than traditional research methods today, and communities allow collaboration to get the finer details. 
 
don't you think?
Posted @ Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:48 AM by Esteban Kolsky
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Latest Posts

Loading
What's New
Don't Be in the 4%
VoC on Twitter
Verint Blog
Verint Blog: Read the Latest from the Verint Systems Blog